<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN 2.0 takes dancing lessons &#8211; do we need choreographies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bpmn.info/2008/10/15/bpmn-20-takes-dancing-lessons-do-we-need-choreographies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bpmn.info/2008/10/15/bpmn-20-takes-dancing-lessons-do-we-need-choreographies/</link>
	<description>world&#039;s sexiest process models</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:22:31 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Column 2 by Sandy Kemsley : Bookmarks for October 15th</title>
		<link>http://blog.bpmn.info/2008/10/15/bpmn-20-takes-dancing-lessons-do-we-need-choreographies/comment-page-1/#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator>Column 2 by Sandy Kemsley : Bookmarks for October 15th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bpmn.info/?p=39#comment-6207</guid>
		<description>[...] BPMN.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BPMN 2.0 takes dancing lessons - do we need choreographies? - Gero Decker on choreography in BPMN: &quot;The number of modeling errors people introduce in their BPMN 1.x choreographies I observe every day cannot stem from a collective dumbness. There must be something fundamentally wrong with the modeling language.&quot; He goes on to explain the new choreography notation proposed in BPMN 2.0.    Posted by Sandy Kemsley on Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 10:00 am. Filed under Links. Follow any responses to this post with its comments RSS feed. You can post a comment or trackback from your blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BPMN.info &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; BPMN 2.0 takes dancing lessons &#8211; do we need choreographies? &#8211; Gero Decker on choreography in BPMN: &quot;The number of modeling errors people introduce in their BPMN 1.x choreographies I observe every day cannot stem from a collective dumbness. There must be something fundamentally wrong with the modeling language.&quot; He goes on to explain the new choreography notation proposed in BPMN 2.0.    Posted by Sandy Kemsley on Wednesday, October 15, 2008, at 10:00 am. Filed under Links. Follow any responses to this post with its comments RSS feed. You can post a comment or trackback from your blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

